Journal
Human Written Posted August 16, 2026 · 57 days ago

Dires Gashu Abayneh
Comments

Abstract

Learning Experience Design (LXD) has emerged as a distinct discipline at the intersection of instructional design, user experience(UX) design , cognitive science, and educational psychology, yet much of the existing literature still treats it as instructional design with a fresh coat of paint , better interfaces layered onto the same content delivery logic. This conceptual paper argues that LXD deserves recognition as its own epistemic practice: one concerned not merely with the transmission of information, but with the deliberate shaping of the conditions under which a person changes their mind, their skills and ultimately their sense of what they are capable of .Synthesizing research in cognitive load theory , self -determination theory, and human-centered design, the paper proposes a four dimensional framework Cognition, Emotion, Context, and Identity(CECI) and examines how each dimension informs design decisions that are too often left implicit. The framework is then applied to a specific and under examined setting infrastructure position markedly different from the assumptions embedded in most LXD literature .The paper concludes with implications for practitioners, researchers , and institutions seeking to move beyond “engagement” as a design goal and toward durable , transferable and contextually resilient learning.

23
Views
5
Downloads
—
Citations

not yet indexed

0
Cited here

papers on ScholarXIV

Subjects
soc.ED
Keywords
Learning experience design · Instructional design · Cognitive load theory · Learner motivation · Human-centered design · Educational technology · EdTech Ethiopia · Digital education · Digital learning Africa · UX design in education · Curriculum design · Online learning systems
AI authorship disclosure
Human Written
Licence
CC BY 4.0
Submitted as
PDF only

Submission history

  1. v1 Aug 16, 2026 0.3 MB current

    First posted.